Studi¶
Beretta Marco (2015), La rivoluzione culturale di Lucrezio. Filosofia e scienza nell’antica Roma, Carocci, Roma.
Bignone Ernesto (1920), Le muse eraclitee in Lucrezio, in Aa.Vv., Miscellanea di studi critici in onore di Ettore Stampini, Lattes & C., Torino-Genova, pp. 229-231
Boyancé Pierre (1970), Lucrezio e l’epicureismo, Paideia, Brescia.
Canfora Luciano (1993), Vita di Lucrezio, Sellerio, Palermo.
Farrell Joseph (2020), Was Memmius a Good King?, in O’Rourke ed. 2020, pp. 219-240.
Gerlo Aloïs (1956), Pseudo-Lucretius?, «L’Antiquité Classique», T. 25, Fasc. 1, pp. 41-72.
Giancotti Francesco (1950), Il preludio di Lucrezio, D’Anna, Messina-Firenze.
Nail Thomas (2018), Lucretius I. An Ontology of Motion, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Id. (2020), Lucretius II. An Ethics of Motion, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Id. (2022), Lucretius III. A History of Motion, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Nethercut Jason S.(2021), Ennius Noster: Lucretius and the Annales, Oxford University Press, Oxfodr.
Nichols James H. (1976), Epicurean Political Philosophy. The De Rerum Natura of Lucretius, Cornell University Press, Ithaca and London.
Nussbaum Martha (1998), Terapia del desiderio. Teoria e pratica nell’etica ellenistica, Vita e Pensiero, Milano.
O’Rourke Donncha (ed.)(2020), Approaches to Lucretius.Traditions and Innovations in Reading the De Rerum Natura, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rebeggiani Stefano (2019), Roman Agamemnon. Political Echoes in the Proem to Lucretius’ De rerum natura, in «Mnemosyne», fasc. 1–23.
Sedley David, The Empedoclean Opening, in Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Lucretius, edited by Monica R. Gale, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007, pp. 49-87.
Segal Charles (1990), Lucretius on Death and Anxiety. Poetry and Philosophy in De Rerum Natura, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Vesperini P. (2017), Lucrèce. Archéologie d’un classique européenne, Fayard, Paris.